Learning Styles and Classroom Resource Site

 

 

Home----CSULA Classes --- ASSC School Climate --- TCM --- About/Contact --- Workshops --- John Shindler

CSULA----Charter College of Education----Classroom Management Resources----Paragon Learning Style Inventory (PLSI)----Assessment----Teaching Resources-----Mindfulness

 

 

Learning Styles Resource Site

 

 

 

Learning Style Inventory Comparison

 

Paragon Learning Style Inventory

 

Information and Links:

Dunn and Dunn

H. Gardner: M.I.

Kolb/4MAT

Gregorc

Myers-Briggs MBTI

Abiators/Modalities

Field-Dependence/

Independence

Keirsey Bates TS

 

 

Complete PLSI interactive Materials – online

Authorized use only

 

This site is intended to provide a resource to teachers, students, parents and educators in the area of learning styles. Given that the number of learning style sites and inventories are growing, making informed decisions related to incorporating learning styles thinking into ones curriculum and/or personal life may be difficult. For this reason, this site offers some information and comparison related to many of the leading theories and inventories, in addition to resource and research links.

 

*      Take the Paragon Learning Style Inventory

*      Teaching Across Type: 5 Principles for Teachers

*      PLSI Interpretive Resources

*      10 Reasons to incorporate the PLSI

 

Image result for learning styles images

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Resource Materials

 

 

 

The following 3 charts provide a cross reference of the Kolb, Gregorc, and Modalities Learning Style Systems.

 Integrating Learning Style Formats

 

Concrete/S

Abstract/N

Reflective

ISTJ

6%

ISFJ

6%

INFJ

2%

INTJ

2%

ISTP

5%

 

ISFP

5%

INFP

3%

INTP

3%

Experiential

ESTP

11%

 

ESFP

12%

ENFP

6%

ENTP

6%

ESTJ

11%

 

ESFJ

12%

ENFJ

5%

ENTJ

5%

In the above framework used in the 4mat or Kolb Learning Style Test the following equivalents can be used:

Introvert = Reflective,   Extrovert = Experiential      Concrete = Sensate,   Abstract = Intuitives   

 

 

 

Concrete/S

Abstract/N

 

Sequential/J

ISTJ

6%

 

ISFJ

6%

INFJ

2%

INTJ

2%

 

 

 

Random/P

ISTP

5%

 

ISFP

5%

INFP

3%

INTP

3%

ESTP

11%

 

ESFP

12%

ENFP

6%

ENTP

6%

 

Sequential/J

 

ESTJ

11%

 

ESFJ

12%

ENFJ

5%

ENTJ

5%

In the above framework used in the Gregorc system the following equivalents can be used:

Sequential = Judger,    Random = Perceiver         Concrete = Sensate,  Abstract = Intuitives

 

 

 

Concrete/S

Abstract/N

 

Sequential/J

ISTJ

6%

 

ISFJ

6%

INFJ

Visual

INTJ

Learners

 

 

 

Random/P

ISTP

5%

 

ISFP

5%

INFP

3%

INTP

3%

ESTP

Kinesthetic

 

ESFP

Learners

ENFP

Auditory

ENTP

Learners

 

Sequential/J

 

ESTJ

11%

 

ESFJ

12%

ENFJ

5%

ENTJ

5%

The following chart depicts how the 3 learning modalities (See Abiator site)

manifest on the Jungian Dimensions

 

Copyright © Paragon Educational Consulting 2011

Permission required for reproduction